Battle of Plassey was a great betrayal

The Battle of Plassey was not a great battle but a great betrayal. comment.प्लासी की लड़ाई एक बड़ा युद्ध नहीं एक बड़ा विश्वासघात थी// टिप्पणी कीजिए//

It is said that though the verdict of Plassey (1757) proved to have a decisive and long term impact. It is considered by scholars to be a great betrayal, not a great battle. Never during the battle did the entire strength of the Bengal army fight the British.

Outcome of Battle of Plassey :

The outcome of Plassey was predetermined as a result in the court of Siraj.
A conspiracy had been hatched to replace the King by Durlabh and influential bankers, Jagat Seth and Omi Chand and a very large portion of Bengal army, under the command of Mir Jafer participate in the Battle of Plassey.

Therefore, even though the British intrigues Nawab by Rai s, as a result, Jafar, did not fight. Bengal army numbered 50,000, the much smaller British force of 3000 men was easily able to emerge victorious.

The extent of the battle can be estimated from the fact that total British casualties were 65 while those of the Bengal army were 500. The outcome, to us, was not a result of military superiority in maneuvers or strategy, but a transition in which the bankers of Bengal and Mir Jafar sold their Nawab to the British .

Battle of Plassey was a great betrayal

Thus, it was treason and not valour that decided the outcome of Plassey. It is called a great betrayal instead of a great battle by some scholars.

The Battle of Plassey was basically a betrayal rather than a real military clash. According to a modern historian K.M. Pani bankers of Bengal sold their Nawab to the British“. In this battle, the rich battle led to the British conquest of Bengal rather than over India. The agreement concluded with the newly appointed Nawab Mir Zafar, resulting in economic control over Bengal, Bihar and Orissa.

However, the British conquest of India was still left after the conquest of Bengal. First of all, the British needed to defeat their European revival-the French within the Indian Territory. Besides, the British needed to defeat strong regional powers like the Marathas, the rulers of Mysore and the Sikh forces in Punjab.

Moreover, the Mughal emperor still continued to rule over Delhi. Even though he was a nominal head of the Indian Territory. Given the existence of strong regional powers and Mughal victory over Bengal was just the beginning rather than the completion of the conquest of India.

Hence, it can be safely concluded that if the British could be defeated in any of the subsequent battles against the Marathas, the Sikh forces of Punjab and the Mughal Emperor. The Battle of Plassey would have remained as a minor episode in the history of India. Therefore, the Battle Of Buxar fought after the Battle of Plassey proved to be more decisive towards India.

History Optional Answer Writing unireaders

Click for video discussion on the question

History Course – Uni-Readers (unireaders.com)